Clearing up the confusion
A structure built with some materials which produce less CO2 than a traditional, or legacy product, or is constructed using dubious, or allegedly sustainable materials, does not make a structure itself sustainable.
A LEED certification doesn’t make it so either. Tax credits don’t make for sustainability, although they do make getting there more financially possible, even on your own home.
Sustainability is not unlike the solution to the problems associated with the tragedy of the commons. As Jack Welch said:” Change before you have to”.
For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet, we all breathe the same air, we all cherish our children’s future, and we are all mortal.
A building with a LEED certification that uses recycled products but needs reframed on the exterior after only seven years is not truly sustainable. We need to go beyond simply using recycled materials and focus on creating buildings that will last at least to the expected life cycle, or even the statute of repose.
While the tax credit that comes with a LEED certification can be a valuable incentive for builders, we need to ensure that the focus remains on creating buildings that are truly sustainable, rather than just meeting the minimum requirements for certification.
I also appreciate and respect the different types of owners and business models within the multifamily community of developers and owners. Some business models may not have the same level of commitment or interest in long-term sustainability as others, and that is understandable.
In conclusion, we need to move beyond the trendy and overused term of sustainability and focus on creating truly sustainable buildings that will stand the test of time. LEED certification can be a valuable tool in this effort, but we need to ensure that it is used as a means to an end, not an end in itself.